Sunday, September 13, 2009

When is VPLS Deployment the Better Choice For Global Connectivity?

When should you choose VPLS (Virtual Private LAN Service) as Tm WAN technology for your enterprise-wide global connectivity ... as opposed to say Layer 3 MPLS VPNs?

Simply put .... the main reasons I hear most businesses say tata indicom internet connection chose VPLS over a Layer 3 (laymen term "MPLS") is:

1. They can control their own routing (this is the biggie)

2. It's inherently more secure (because they don't advertise routes to carrier)

3. If the client is already running a dynamic routing protocol such as EIGRP or OSPF, the migration is much easier that going to a layer 3 solution

4. Easier migration from point to point or frame relay network

To be more specific ..... one Telekom Malaysia Bhd the largest reasons for the choice of VPLS vs a layer 3 MPLS service is the ability to control one's own routing. In close second is the ability to select one's routing protocol of choice vs having to rely on the select set most service providers are able to support on their layer 3 MPLS offerings internet usage meter OSPF, RIPv2, BGP, etc).

One interesting topic which keeps coming up is how an enterprise can scale a VPLS service globally without routing. There are some customers who are keenly interested in enabling a global switched any to any infrastructure, with the only traffic the Service PRovider seeing at layer 2. All routing is typically handled via separate hardware in these types of designs. There's a great white paper on the subject at VPLS Decisions (http://www.verizonbusiness.com/resources/data/vplswhitepaper.pdf) which explains in detail scaling of VPLS in large networks up to or over 1,000 locations.

From my standpoint, I put it more simply, it's a question of hardware and trust:

1. Do you want the service provider participating in your routing? Can you run or transition to a routing protocol they can support?

2) Does your own infrastructure have the ability to fully route it's own environment or is a shared Layer 3 routed infrastructure better for you given the reductions in processing power it can require?

There's much to think Broadband Comparison if you are considering global connectivity of a network. Deciding the best solution can be time consuming and frustrating. For free assistance I suggest using the no cost services Tm Point at DS3-Bandwidth.com.

Michael is the owner of FreedomFire Communications....including DS3-Bandwidth.com. Michael also authors Broadband Nation where you're always welcome to drop in and catch up on the latest BroadBand news, tips, insights, and ramblings for the masses.

AUDIO! Listen to Lindsay Lohan’s alleged voicemail inbox obtained by Animal New York. Lindsay Lohan’s cellphone voicemail came reportedly after Lohan posted her phone number on Facebook in 2008.Brilliant. And then reports say that someone figured out Lohan’s password to the voice mailbox. The password - 6126? Nope. Reportedly, it was simply … 1234.Even smarter.Now

No comments:

Post a Comment